National Legal Aid & Defender Association Join NLADA

Web This Site
  About NLADA  | Civil Resources  | Defender Resources  | Training and Conferences  | Communication Resources  | Member Services  | Job Opportunities  | NLADA Insurance Program
 
American Council of Chief Defenders
Sections
Defending Immigrants Partnership
E-Library
Funding/Resources
Government Relations
National Alliance of Sentencing Advocates & Mitigation Specialists
National Defender Leadership Institute
NIDC
Practitioner's Corner

Public Information
Public Opinion
Right to Counsel Resource Kit
Standards
Technology
JSERI
Defender_Trainers
National Association of Sentencing and Mitigation Specialists
Printer Friendly Page

National Alliance of Sentencing Advocates & Mitigation Specialists  | About NASAMS  | NASAMS Membership  | NASAMS Awards  | NASAMS Meetings

In Defense of Public Access to Justice: An Assessment of Trial-Level Indigent Defense Services in Louisiana 40 Years After Gideon

A commitment to justice for all is the cornerstone of the American social contract and our democratic system. We entrust our government with the administration of a judicial system that guarantees equal justice before the law -- assuring victims, the accused and the general public that resulting verdicts are fair, correct, swift and final. In Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963), the United States Supreme Court concluded that that the right to counsel for those unable to afford one is a fundamental part of due process and determined that state government is responsible for providing an appropriate public defense system that honors this basic right. In accordance with its obligations under Gideon, the 1974 Louisiana Constitution directs the legislature to “provide for a uniform system for securing and compensating qualified counsel for indigents.”

In direct violation of the state and federal constitutions, Louisiana government (both state and local) has constructed a disparate system that fosters systemic ineffective assistance of counsel due primarily to inadequate funding and a lack of independence from undue political interference. These two main systemic deficiencies produce numerous ancillary problems including a lack of oversight, training and supervision of those entrusted with the defense of the poor. When combined with the crushing caseloads public defenders are forced to carry, these factors prevent the state from securing justice for all, protecting the peace, and promoting the general welfare of its people.

The evidence to support this conclusion is detailed in a new report, In Defense of Public Access to Justice, researched and written by National Legal Aid & Defender Association commissioned for the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL). In developing the standards-based assessment methodology employed in this report, NLADA looked at the macro-level – i.e. the general problems facing all Judicial Districts – as well as the specific problems manifested at the micro-level in one judicial district (Avoyelles Parish). The report was released Tuesday March 9, 2004 at a press conference in the Louisiana State Capitol.

Click here for press information.

To read the report, download the files below:

138 KB Executive Summary

631 KB Executive Summary and Full Report

400 KB Appendices A-L